-: FOLLOW US :- @theinsaneapp
Prof. Dr. Anne Lauber-Rönsberg is working on the ownership of AI-generated images and texts.
-: FOLLOW US :- @theinsaneapp
Till now, AI has been used as a tool in artistic contexts, with copyright granted to the artist if essential design decisions are made by them.
-: FOLLOW US :- @theinsaneapp
Products created by AI without substantial human intervention are free of copyright in continental European law.
-: FOLLOW US :- @theinsaneapp
In contrast, British copyright law provides copyright protection for purely computer-generated performances.
-: FOLLOW US :- @theinsaneapp
There is a debate about whether copyright should protect only human creativity or grant exclusivity to purely AI-generated products.
-: FOLLOW US :- @theinsaneapp
Anthropocentric copyright law privileges humans because of their ability to experience and feel, which justifies their privileging.
-: FOLLOW US :- @theinsaneapp
Machine co-authorship of scientific contributions should be rejected because it requires taking responsibility for the publication,
-: FOLLOW US :- @theinsaneapp
Which even the most human-like generative AI systems cannot do.
-: FOLLOW US :- @theinsaneapp
Some experts says The implications of AI-generated products for copyright law and ownership need to be further explored.